Abstract

Background: India’s rapidly aging population faces increasing health, social, and economic vulnerabilities. Although several laws and welfare schemes exist, gaps in implementation and awareness continue to undermine their effectiveness. Aims: This article examines the existing legal framework for the rights and welfare of older persons in India, evaluates its strengths and shortcomings, and recommends reforms for a more inclusive, rights-based approach. Method: An analysis of primary legislation, such as the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and personal laws, was conducted, supported by comparative insights and policy literature. Results: Findings reveal that while legal provisions reflect progressive intent, they suffer from fragmentation, poor execution, and a lack of geriatric-specific healthcare integration. Conclusions: Stronger enforcement, unified elder-care legislation, and a shift in perspective from welfare to legal entitlement are necessary to ensure older adults in India live with dignity, autonomy, and full participation.

Keywords

Acts, Aged, Elder Abuse, India, Legislation, Older Adults, Patient Rights, Welfare

Introduction

India is undergoing a significant demographic shift, with the elderly population (aged 60 and above) rising rapidly due to advancements in healthcare and increased life expectancy. As per the 2021 Elderly in India report by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, by 2050, nearly 19.5% of the population will be over sixty (60).¹ Despite this demographic transformation, India’s legislative and healthcare frameworks for geriatric care remain fragmented, inadequately resourced, and largely reactive rather than preventive. A national study in 2019 revealed that two-thirds of older respondents faced financial crises, while four-fifths were dependent on family for basic needs and daily living.² The burden on families has intensified over the past two decades, with disintegrating joint family systems, increased migration, and weakening traditional support structures. Coupled

with physical frailty, mental health challenges, and functional decline, older individuals are increasingly vulnerable to neglect, abuse, and exploitation.^3,4 In such a context, ensuring the maintenance, welfare, and dignity of older adults is a pressing concern.⁴

In the above context, the objective of the review article was to review the existing statutes for senior citizens in India, highlighting their gaps, implementation failures, and the need for robust, contextually sensitive reforms. The constitutional rights and different acts enacted to protect, promote, and maintain the legal rights to live with dignity in society were explored to formulate a review pertaining to the geriatric population.

Legal protections for the older adults in India Constitutional Provisions

A constitutional provision is any rule, principle, or clause formally set into a nation’s constitution – the highest legal document that describes the makeup, authority, and duties of the government and the rights and obligations of its citizens. Essentially, it is a legally enforceable vow by the state and the basis for all laws and policies that come after. On the part of Indian older citizens, constitutional provisions do not necessarily refer to older persons in themselves but establish a legal and moral framework that obligates the state to be accountable for their welfare. The provisions do recognize the role of the state to safeguard, assist, and enhance the dignity and well-being of older persons and, therefore, are the forebears of special welfare legislation for senior citizens.

The following articles of the Indian Constitution have provisions in the legal framework to protect the rights of older adults, which are enumerated.

1. Article 41 – The state shall, within the limits of its economic capacity and development, make effective provision for securingthe right to work, to education, and to public assistance in case of old age, sickness, and
2. Article 46 – The state shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people and protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation, which implies that the senior citizens, being a special section of the weaker section,should be protected from all forms of exploitation and abuse.⁵

1. Article 21 – The “right to life” under Article 21 is not a right to live or survive, but a right to live with dignity, autonomy, security, and proper care. This includes access to healthcare, proper shelter, economic security, freedom from abuse and neglect, and the right to make decisions about one’s own life.

Acts relevant for older adults in India

There are various Acts and legal provisions supporting older adults and various aspects of their care. A summary of the acts is given in Table 1.

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007

In the Indian traditional system, which promotes social cohesion, the value of parents has taken on a new dimension in the last two decades because of social changes like industrialization, urbanization, and migration. All these factors contributed to the neglect of the older adults, necessitating legal provisions to assist the senior citizens in securing maintenance support from their children. The MWP Act, 2007, has enabled the provision to secure maintenance support through the tribunal (notified as assistant commissioner/sub-divisional officer of the state) with the powers of a civil court under this act. This act seeks maintenance by removing the necessity of a lawyer to represent the case, or the tribunal can take suo motu cognizance. There is also a provision for facilitating amicable settlement through assistance.

Key Features of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Act, 2019,⁷ are given below.

1. Expanded Definition and Scope of Responsibility: The bill redefines “children” to include daughter-in-law and son-in-law, expanding legal responsibility for care. It also broadens the meaning of “welfare” to include comprehensive physical and mental well-being, not just financial support.

2. Flexible Maintenance Amount: The earlier maintenancecap of ₹10,000 per month has been  Tribunals now have the discretion to determine suitable maintenance based on the senior citizen’s needs and the financial capability of the children or relatives.
   3. Faster and Prioritized Tribunal Proceedings: The disposal of applications will be based on the date of receipt rather than the date of notice. Additionally, cases involving individuals aged 80 and above will be given priority with stricter timelines for resolution.
3. StrengthenedSupport and Oversight Mechanisms:
   1. Maintenance officers will act as single-point support resources to guide senior citizens.
      1. Nodal officers in police stations and special police units at the district level will ensure better enforcement and protection.
   2. A national helpline with a common toll-free number will provide immediate assistance and enhance safety.
   3. Better Regulation of Senior Care Services: The bill introduces enhanced regulation for senior citizen care homes,day care centres, and home care services to ensure standardized and quality service delivery.
   4. Improved Accessibility and Legal Remedies: Senior citizens can now submit maintenance applications online, improving access. The right to appeal has also been extended to children and relatives in line with natural

This act is perhaps the most articulate legal response in India to the issue of old age care. It binds legal heirs and adult children to give monthly maintenance to senior citizens who cannot maintain themselves. Though its motive is humanitarian, its implementation is poor. The main hindrance in the implementation of this act is complicated  administrative  issues,  delays  in  the completion of appeals in high courts, a lack of old age homes, challenges in the treatment of chronic cognitive disorders in old age, and protection of life and property because of physical and financial abuse.⁸ The prevalence of elder abuse is one of the major public health problems and is considered a significant violation of human rights. Indian studies have also indicated a significant prevalence of elder abuse. The prevalence studies done by Mehra et al. indicated that 41.6% of the older adults reported abuse.⁶ In contrast, other recent studies by Panruti et al. and Sathya et al. reported a prevalence of 25.6%, with predominant abuse being psychological.^8,9 The tribunals are overwhelmed, older litigants have mobility issues, and social shame keeps parents from taking legal action against their children.

Mental Healthcare Act, 2017

The Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA, 2017) is a paradigm shift from custodial and sometimes punitive management of mental illness to a rights-based and patient-centered one. MHCA 2017, which came into force in May 2018 in India, has a significant implication for the geriatric population in promoting mental health care and protecting the rights of the geriatric population.¹⁰ MHCA 2017 emphasizes specialized clinical services for older adults in mental health care institutions. Older adults with mental health problems such as dementia have a high risk of loss of mental capacity, abuse, violation of their rights, and institutionalization. Rehabilitation services for the older adults are a significant development emphasized in this act because of social breakdown in society. Several provisions of the act, such as those related to mental capacity, advance directives, the nominated representative (NR), and the responsibilities of other agencies, have specific challenges related to older adults with mental illness.^8,9

The MHCA 2017 Section 18(4)e articulates that provision of old age mental health services at each district level is a right under the “Right to access mental health care,” and if not fulfilled, compensation must be provided as per section 18(5)f. MHCA 2017 also emphasizes that old-age patients shall not have to travel a long distance to avail themselves of these old-age mental health services as per section 15(5)d. Sections 100 and 101 of MHCA 2017 specify the responsibilities of police in the management of wandering persons with mental illness (PMI). Older adult patients with cognitive impairment and dementia have a high risk of wandering behaviour. They are more vulnerable due to the difficulty in proper communication. Proactive assistance from the police would be very helpful for the appropriate care of wandering older adults with dementia and other mental illnesses.^11,12

In view of the above-mentioned parameters of the MHCA 2017, the rehabilitation, elder abuse, violation of rights of senior citizens, and management of PMI by the police will be the future challenge for the appropriate government and concerned stakeholders related to the act. But though progressive on paper, the implementation of the act is hindered by the unavailability of trained manpower, financial limitations, and urban-rural disparity in mental

healthcare. However, India’s advance directive provision is progressive, particularly in a part of the world where mental health remains. In many states of India, MHCA 2017 is still not implemented with new rules and regulations.

Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956

The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA), is a central part of the Hindu Code Bills and a pivotal statute with direct impact on the well-being of older persons. The Act enacts into statute the ethical and legal duty of offspring to support their elder parents.¹³ While exclusively aimed at Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs, the Act is consistent with a cultural norm that assigns the initial responsibility for care of the older adults to the family. It enacts that “a Hindu is bound, during his or her lifetime, to maintain his or her legitimate or illegitimate children and his or her aged or infirm parents, if they are unable to maintain themselves.” Both sons and daughters must be entrusted with the duty so that there can be gender equality. Notably, this provision runs contrary to the common patriarchal notion that the sons should be the sole caretakers in old age. The word “maintenance” used in the Act is generic. It encompasses not just food, clothing, and shelter but also reasonable medical expenses and other necessities of life. The provision can be enforced through civil action, and children may be required to pay a monthly allowance or a lump sum according to their ability and the needs of the parent.

This act assumes significance in the contemporary backdrop of nuclear families, urban living, and growing abuse of the older adults. With the joint family system itself dwindling, many older people have no informal support structure. The act provides legal succour in such cases and makes the responsibility at the familial level not merely a moral one but one that can be enforced legally.

Section 20 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, is an important provision that grounds the care of older parents on adult children’s legal duty. It demonstrates two aspects of the policy of the Indian state: combining personal law and welfare duties, as well as exposing the lacunae still existing across communities. Cementing familiarity and access to this provision will help ensure there is no older person left vulnerable because of family indifference or religious loopholes.¹³

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act 2016) received the assent of the President on December 27, 2016. The preamble of this act clearly states that it aims to uphold the dignity of every Person with Disability (PwD) in the society and prevent any form of discrimination.¹⁴ The RPwD Act 2016 is a consolidating legislation enacted to give substance to India’s commitment to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD).¹⁵ The Act replaces the earlier Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, and introduces new spheres under its canopy by listing 21 categories of disabilities, the majority of which have a direct relationship with older persons. Of great significance in the RPwD Act is its rights-based and inclusive approach, shifting from a welfare to an empowerment, equality, and dignity approach.¹⁶ While the Act is not senior citizen-oriented, it is highly relevant to them, given that aging comes with disability, i.e., impairment of eyesight and hearing, impairment of mobility, neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease), and mental illness.

The RPwD Act is a person with a disability who has a permanent physical, mental, intellectual, or sensory impairment, which means the inability to function fully and effectively in society. Most older citizens are included in this category, particularly the elderly disabled. The Act mentions those disabilities like locomotor disability, visual impairment, hearing impairment, chronic neurological disorder, and multiple disabilities – all common during old age.

Major provisions of the RPwD Act governing older people are as follows.

1. Equality and Non-Discrimination (Section 3): The Act mandates that the disabled must not be discriminated against and must be accorded equal protection and legal rights. This must be applied to older persons who just happen to be socially excluded or marginalized due to their disabilities.

1. Accessibility(40-46): The Act places firm emphasis on the public infrastructure, transport, information, and communications to be made accessible. For the older citizens with mobility or sensory disabilities, this provision becomes necessary in promoting independent and dignified living.
2. Health and Rehabilitation (25-30): This obliges the government to provide necessary healthcare,rehabilitation centres, and disability prevention  It can prove to be a boon to the geriatric citizenry, especially in rural or backward areas.
3. Reservation in Employment and Education (Sections 32, 34): Although these are essentially intended for disabled youth groups, able and willing older persons, especially in government positions or schemes of lifelong education, can utilize these.
4. Guardianship and Legal Capacity(Section 13): Feeling the fragility of mentally and intellectually disabled individuals common in old age, the Act provides safe decision-making and limited guardianship, ensuring the independence of the older persons.

Lastly, the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, is a robust legislative tool to enhance and defend the rights of disabled older individuals. The act reasserts the state’s duty to uphold the dignity, autonomy, and participation of older citizens in all walks of life.

Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 is the foundation of criminal law in India, which has now changed to Bharatiya Naya Sanhita (BNS) 2023. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, was enacted to consolidate and amend provisions relating to offences. It was enacted recently and has a very important role to play in dealing with offenses against older persons, who are most prone to physical, mental, and financial exploitation in India.¹⁷ Provisions such as sections 323 and 325 (voluntarily causing hurt or grievous hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation), 405 and 420 (breach of trust and cheating), and 498A (husband or relatives’ cruelty) are regularly used in elder abuse cases, from assault and intimidation to property coercion and financial exploitation.

Still, the lack of age-specific penal provisions is a glaring omission. In contrast to the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, or the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA) 2005, elder abuse has no focused laws and protections.^18,19 Older persons are not reported as being abused because they are emotionally dependent on abusers, stigmatized, or fearful of retaliation. And law enforcement is not trained to recognize elder-specific abuse.

While the MWP Act, 2007, provides civil recourse for neglect, it does not suffice unless supplemented by related criminal provisions. To bring effective protection, India requires legislative changes that identify elder abuse as a separate category, require reporting, and guarantee age-sensitive investigation and enforcement. Justice and dignity can only be guaranteed for India’s aging population then.

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987

The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, was passed to implement the mandate of Article 39A of the Indian Constitution for free legal aid and equal justice to all, and particularly to the weaker sections. For the older individuals – the majority of whom are confronted with economic, physical, or informational disabilities – this act performs an important function in facilitating access to justice.²⁰

At Section 12, the elderly, especially economically dependent persons, are specifically provided with free legal aid in terms of legal service, counsel, conciliation, and assistance in pursuing cases before courts. Such provisions are ensured by bodies such as the National Legal Service Authority (NALSA), State Legal Service Authority (SLSA), and District Legal Service Authority (DLSA in the form of legal awareness camps, helplines, and Lok Adalats – ad-hoc courts providing speedy and less daunting options as compared to regular litigation.

Legal services to older persons frequently include legal assistance in the maintenance of cases, settlement of property disputes, pension cases, or abuse and neglect. Modes such as legal aid clinics at villages and old  age homes, and collaborative ventures with law colleges bring the legal facilities to their doorsteps.²¹

Yet, awareness and access are a problem, particularly in rural areas. Centres are not necessarily age-friendly, and the older adults themselves are not generally aware of their rights. Despite all these defects, the Act is an indispensable safety net, translating constitutional guarantees of equal justice into real-life assistance to India’s older citizens.

Indian Succession Act, 1925

The Indian Succession Act, 1925, regulates the distribution of a dead person’s property, either by will (testamentary succession) or in the absence of a will (intestate succession). Although the act has always been conceived of as a code for successors, it has very significant protection for older persons, particularly those who have immovable property.²²

For the older adults, the making a will is possibly the most important legal instrument to protect their property and independence. The Act prescribes certain procedures for signing, witnessing, and attestation of wills to make them valid and protect older persons from force or emotional coercion.²¹ Section 61 particularly ensures that the probate of a will is challenged in the case where it has been procured by fraud, coercion, or undue influence, which is critical because most older people are vulnerable.

The act extends to Parsis, Christians, and others, whereas Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, and Buddhists are usually governed by the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, although they may be able to make wills under the said act as well. Muslims are mainly governed by personal law, although provisions of the said Act can also extend.^22,23

Although beneficial, awareness levels are low. Most of the older persons are dissuaded by their families or lack access to legal counsel. In spite of this, the act compels them to achieve equitable inheritance, suppress abuse, and acquire dignity by planning estates and being independent.

Discussion

It is important to reflect on the legal framework for older persons in India and highlight the gaps, current realities, and suggest what can be done. Despite having multiple laws related to the protection of older persons in India, the current legal framework is disjointed and not adequately capable of taking on the multidimensional needs of the older persons. Legislations like the MWP Act, 2007, Section 20 of HAMA 1956, and the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, establish important rights like maintenance, legal aid, and family obligations. The Indian Penal Code criminalizes abandonment and abuse, but the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and the RPwD Act, 2016, protect inheritance rights and disability rights, respectively. These legislations, however, function in an isolated manner in the lack of a unified, rights-oriented legal framework and, therefore, leaves enormous implementation gaps.

Some key areas remain untouched. There is no Indian legal definition or recognition of elder abuse, and emotional, psychological, and financial abuse continues to be unpunished and invisible. There are no statutory health care entitlements for the older persons, and the National Policy on Older Persons is non-binding. In particular, the field of law and health remains underdeveloped. There is no legislation guaranteeing access to affordable geriatric services, mental health measures, or accountability procedures in old-age homes. Older women, especially widows, are exposed to special vulnerabilities for which current laws do not provide adequate cover.

What is needed is a single, comprehensive Elder Rights Act that integrates civil protections, criminal provisions, healthcare assurances, social security, and affordable redress mechanisms. This legislation must incorporate mandatory reporting of elder abuse, specialized protection officers, laws for elder care homes, and maintenance equality acts for all religious communities. Special attention should be accorded to senior citizen-friendly health centres, cheaper drugs, and governmental duty in the dispensing of pensions and accommodations. Legal assistance should also be more age-sensitive and more accessible via mobile clinics and trained officers.

The challenges are not merely in loopholes of law but in the conditions of day-to-day life—from low literacy and awareness among the older persons to social stigma regarding seeking legal recourse against one’s children.

Conclusion

As India is experiencing its demographic transition to agedness, the response to care of the old must shift away from welfare interventions in an individualistic vein towards a unified rights-based approach knitted together at its very centre by dignity, equity, and access. What is needed is fewer schemes but improved implementation – evidence-based, decentralized planning and participative policymaking. Future reform must place the highest priority on cross-cutting elder-care legislation, compulsory geriatric sensitivity training for frontline staff, and investment in community care plans that extend beyond the cities.

Most importantly, attitudes toward older individuals need to change – not as a burden on an already strained system, but as individuals who have lived a life of contribution and continue to contribute to giving. Their lives, social contribution, and decision-making capacity need to guide policy from start to finish.

India has the laws in place, but without compassionate enforcement, inter-sectoral coordination, and sustained supervision, the laws are likely to turn symbolic instead of transformational. The future must be one of a society that does not merely safeguard but also empowers its senior citizens.

Acknowledgement

Mental Health Institute (Centre of Excellence), S.C.B. Medical College & Hospital, Cuttack, India

References

9. Velayutham B, Kangusamy B, Joshua V, et al. Theprevalence of disability in elderly in India – analysis of 2011 census data. Disable Health J. 2016; 9; 584-592.
10. Agrawal S. Effect of living arrangement on the health status of elderly in India: Findings from a national cross-sectional survey. Asian Popul Stud, 2012; 8 87-101.
11. Soneja S. Elder abuse in India: country report for World Health Organization. New Delhi: HelpAge India, 2011.
12. Issac TG, Ramesh A, Reddy SS, Sivakumar PT, Kumar CN, Math SB. Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007: A Critical Appraisal. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2021;43(5_suppl): S107-S112. doi: 10.1177/ 02537176211043932.
13. Constitution of India. Articles 41 and 46. Available at indiankannon.org.[Accessed on 19.06.2025.]
14. Mehra A, Grover S, Agarwal A, et al. Prevalence of elder abuse and its association with psychiatric morbidity in a rural setting. J Neurosci Rural Pract, 2019; 10: 218-224.
15. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, requires serious amendments. Govt. of India. New Delhi: 2013. Available at indiacode.nic.in[Accessed on 19.06.2025]
16. PanrutiRV, Liebig PS, and Duvvuru  Gerontology in India. Gerontologist, 2015; 55: 894-900.
17. Sathya T, and Premkumar R. Association of functional limitations and disability with elder abuse in India: A cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr, 2020; 20: 1-11.
18. Govt of India.Mental Health Care Act 2017.Published April7, 2017; Available at indiacode.com [Last accessed on 13.06.2025]
    11. Math SB, Basavaraju V, Harihara SN, Gowda GS,Manjunatha N, Kumar CN, Gowda M. Mental Healthcare Act 2017 – Aspiration to action. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr; 61(Suppl 4): S660-S666. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.
    12. Sivakumar PT, Mukku SSR, Antony S, Harbishettar V, Kumar CN, Math SB. Implications of Mental Healthcare Act 2017for geriatric mental health care delivery: A critical  Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr; 61 (Suppl 4): S763-S767. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_100_19.
    13. TheHindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act  Chapter

III. (Maintenance). Section 20. www.indiacode.nic.in [Last accessed on 18.06.2025]

14. Government of The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act). Available from www.indiacode.com [Last accessed on 13.06.2025]
15. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Personswith  Disabilities.  2006.  Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/c onvention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities [Last accessed on 16.06.2025]
16. DrewN, Funk M, Tang S, Lamichhane J, Chávez E, Katontoka S, Pathare S, Lewis O, Gostin L, Saraceno B. Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: an unresolved global crisis. Lancet. 2011 Nov 5;378(9803):1664-75. doi: 1016/S0140-6736(11)61458-X.
17. Government of India. Indian Penal Code. 1860. Available from indiacode.com.[Last accessed on 13.06.2025]
18. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Available from indiacode.com.[Last accessed on 20.06.2025]
19. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.Available from indiacode.com. [last accessed on 20.06.2025]
20. Government of India. The Legal Service Authorities Act 1987. Available from indiacode.com.[Last accessed on 13.06.2025]
21. Barikar C. Malathesh, P. Lakshmi Nirisha, C. Naveen Kumar, Rajendra Kiragasur Madegowda, Bhavika Vajawat, Chethan Basavarajappa et al. Free legal aid for persons with mental illness and other marginalized groups of population. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 59May 2021; 102654. DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102654.
22. Government of India. Indian Succession Act 1925. Available from indiacode.com.[Last accessed on 19.06.2025]
23. Lamba Evolution of Succession Rights in India and Equity

– An Analysis. (April 26, 2023). Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4429844 [Last accessed on 19.06.2025]